SnippETS - 28 Febuary 2008
Welcome

Welcome to the two weekly review of energy and environmental events and developments from both here in New Zealand and on an international basis. As always we hope you find our collection of stories to be of interest in what continues to be a high growth sector.

The Irish are known for luck and for Guinness, however they don’t seem to be relying on four leaf clovers to maintain energy supply. The approach taken is to use “three leafed” wind turbines in conjunction with Vanadium Redox Batteries (VRB) and pumped storage (hydro) in order to maintain supply during periods of peak demand. We’re sure that Transpower will continue to keep a close watch on Ireland, as it sets the example of another island with similar wind resource, energy demand and transmission issues.

The EU Chief Foreign Policy Coordinator paints a bleak picture of water, food and energy resource availability due to climate change. Kansas now, where energy efficiency initiatives are being undertaken by large electricity utility. This is undertaken with the objective of offsetting demand for new coal-fired power stations due to the lower cost of energy efficiency compared with new generation capacity – good to see some positive action here.

Other stories we’ve heard include energy retailers swapping out inefficient fluorescent tubes for efficient lighting at no cost to the consumer – good job!

The OECD Environmental Outlook to 2030 expects global GHG emissions to grow by 37% to 2030, and 52% to 2050 unless new policy action is introduced.

World GDP is also expected to double by 2030.

Kivalina is a small village in Alaska, which is being flooded due to the changing Artic climate. A legal battle has been initiated where the village are suing oil companies, electricity utilities and a coal company due to their contribution to the problem. If second hand smoke causes cancer, they may have a point, but big tobacco wasn’t the lifeblood of a nation that energy is. “Quit electricity, we can help”, “0800 QUIT-ELEC”, or “every kWh you use is killing your children” just don’t seem to have the same appeal as the anti-smoking campaigns. Best of luck to them.

Because water is such a major constraint to some at the moment (hydro storage, farm irrigation, town supply etc) we look at crops that may be able to “hedge” a drought, and desalination using wind turbines for small sites, whilst General Electric contracts to provide desalinised water to a city in Algeria.

Ireland: Where wind power is king Posted by Michael Kanellos
DUBLIN, Ireland--It's easier here than in most industrialized nations to green the electrical grid. Peak demand for electricity in the Republic of Ireland comes to about 5,000 megawatts, Graham Brennan, program manager for renewable-energy research and development at Sustainable Energy Ireland, the government's green-technology arm, said in an interview in SEI's Dublin offices. The peak occurred last December, at 4,907 megawatts.

Studies show that onshore and offshore wind turbines located in the republic could deliver approximately 5,000 megawatts of power over both parts of the island, he added. This figure takes into account only sites where it would be somewhat practical to put wind turbines, wind speeds, the geography, and the transmission grid.

If Northern Ireland is counted, the figure jumps to 6,000 megawatts. In all, the wind blowing over the island contains 8,000 megawatts of power. "There is enough onshore-accessible wind for about 100 percent of our electricity requirements," he said. "In terms of our accessible resources, the biggest and most successful so far is wind." The blustery situation has created a rush toward wind in the nation. The Republic of Ireland already has installed about 800 megawatts worth of wind turbines, and wind park developers have or are expected to file applications to put an additional 3,700 megawatts worth of wind onto the grid.

The government will likely surpass its goal of having 1,200 megawatts of wind by 2010. (Ireland's ultimate goal is to get 33 percent to 42 percent of its electricity from renewable sources by 2020, a fairly high figure for an industrialized nation.) While most of the turbines are located on land, developers are also looking at offshore wind, similar to the Arklow Bank park developed by General Electric and Airtricity . Tidal-power companies are also receiving a lot of attention.

If Ireland can execute on the potential, it would rank up with France, in terms of renewable energy. France, though, relies on nuclear power, a form of energy banned in Ireland, Germany, and some other EU states. Chalk it up to geography.

The island is one of the first landfalls for winds crossing the Atlantic, so wind hits harder and more constantly than most places in continental Europe. The capacity factory for onshore wind turbines--the measure of how much of the time the turbine is actually cranking out power--comes to 35 percent in Ireland. In Europe, the average is about 25 percent. That means cheaper power.

Electricity from wind costs about 6.2 euro cents a kilowatt-hour here--less than the 8.3 cents a kilowatt-hour that electricity from gas-fired plants costs, Brennan said. The wind figure doesn't include the costs of having a reserve (i.e. a gas facility that can produce power in slack times).

Still, it costs less to generate power from wind than from gas.

Wind from offshore turbines costs about 12 cents a kilowatt-hour because of the higher maintenance and construction costs. Expanding wind power, of course, comes with obstacles.

For one thing, the wind doesn't blow all of the time, and often blows when people don't need power. Thus, the country would need power storage systems and there's not much that exists that can store hundreds of megawatts of wind-generated power. "Power generators love a constant use of power, but they have always had this human demand curve they've had to deal with," he said. To that end, SEI is participating in experiments with flow batteries from VRB Power Systems at a wind farm in Donegal. The batteries, ultimately, could be capable of storing 2 megawatts of power from the 7-megawatt wind plant.

The country also has a 300-megawatt pumped hydro facility in Turlough Hill. With this, wind power is used to pump electricity uphill.

The water then gets released to churn hydroelectric turbines during peak times. Second, setting up thousands of megawatts worth of wind farms means laying down a massive network of transmission lines. In turn, that means negotiating leases with lots of farmers and landowners.

Bureaucratically, that's a mind-boggling task. "It is easy to get financing. It is difficult to get turbines because there is such a demand for them, so there is a big delay for that," he said. "But in Ireland, the biggest delay is getting a grid connection."

As a result, it might be easier to actually concentrate on offshore wind farms. These farms could feed power into undersea cables connected to a power station built near the shore connected to the grid. No farmers involved. Thirdly, any wind power buildup is going to have to be kind to owners of fossil fuel plants. If the country moves too quickly to wind, the profits of fossil fuel plant owners could be impacted.

Fossil fuel plant owners, however, are needed for backup and reserve power.

Finally, wind turbines are in short supply these days, so erecting massive numbers of wind farms will take time. And in those intervening years, power consumption will continue to climb.

http://www.news.com/8301-11128_3-9888020-54.html?part=dht
EU told to prepare for flood of climate change migrants
Global warming threatens to severely destabilise the planet, rendering a fifth of its population homeless, top officials say

Ice boulders left behind after a flood caused by the overflowing of a lake in Greenland

Ice boulders left behind after a flood caused by the overflowing of a lake in Greenland. Photograph: Uriel Sinai/Getty images

In its half-century history, the EU has absorbed wave upon wave of immigrants.

There were the millions of political migrants fleeing Russian-imposed communism to western Europe throughout the cold war, the post-colonial and "guest worker" migrants who poured into western Europe in the boom years of the 1950s and 60s, the hundreds of thousands who escaped the Balkan wars of the 90s and the millions of economic migrants of the past decade seeking a better life. Now, according to the EU's two senior foreign policy officials, Europe needs to brace itself for a new wave of migration with a very different cause - global warming.

The ravages already being inflicted on parts of the developing world by climate change are engendering a new type of refugee, the "environmental migrant". Within a decade "there will be millions of environmental migrants, with climate change as one of the major drivers of this phenomenon," predict Javier Solana and Benita Ferrero-Waldner, the EU's chief foreign policy coordinator and the European commissioner for external relations. "Europe must expect substantially increased migratory pressure."

They point out that some countries already badly hit by global warming are demanding that the new phenomenon be recognised internationally as a valid reason for migration. The immigration alert is but one of seven "threats" that the two officials focus on in pointing to the security implications and the dangers to European interests thrown up by climate change. Their report, the first of its kind to be tabled to an EU summit - opening on Thursday in Brussels - amounts to a wake-up call to the governments of Europe, a demand that they start taking account of climate change and its impact in their security and foreign-policy decisions. The main message is that the immediate and devastating effects of global warming will be felt far away from Europe, with the poor suffering disproportionately in south Asia, the Middle East, central Asia, Africa and Latin America, but that Europe will ultimately bear the consequences.

This could be in the form of mass migration, destabilisation of parts of the world vital to European security, radicalisation of politics and populations, north-south conflict because of the perceived injustice of the causes and effects of global warming, famines caused by arable land loss, wars over water, energy, and other natural resources.

Solana and Ferrero-Waldner paint a picture of a very bleak and very messy new world order which may undermine the UN system. "The multilateral system is at risk if the international community fails to address the threats. Climate change impacts will fuel the politics of resentment between those most responsible for climate change and those most affected by it ... and drive political tension nationally and internationally."

This is not all futurology. The document points out that last year the UN's appeals for emergency humanitarian aid were all, bar one, connected to climate change. As far as international security is concerned, the report finds, global warming makes a bad situation worse. "Climate change is best viewed as a threat multiplier which exacerbates existing trends, tensions and instability," Solana and Ferrero-Waldner say. "The core challenge is that climate change threatens to overburden states and regions which are already fragile and conflict-prone. The risks include political and security risks that directly affect European interests."

The report highlights several forms of conflict that are likely to be driven by the planet heating up: · "Reduction of arable land, widespread shortage of water, diminishing food and fish stocks, increased flooding and prolonged droughts are already happening in many parts of the world," Solana and Ferrero-Waldner say. Fresh water availability could fall by up to 30% in some regions, causing farming losses, surging food prices and shortages, and civil unrest.

"Climate change will fuel existing conflicts over depleting resources." · Around one-fifth of the planet's population inhabits coastal zones which are threatened by rising sea levels and natural disasters. The Caribbean, central America and the east coasts of China and India are most exposed. "An increase in disasters and humanitarian crises will lead to immense pressure on the resources of donor countries." ·

The report notes that major land mass changes are expected in the course of the century from receding coastlines, meaning countries will lose territory, while desertification could have a similar effect. The result may be "a vicious circle of degradation, migration and conflicts over territory and borders that threatens the political stability of countries and regions". ·

A similar result may be expected in failing states, where frustration and disenchantment breed ethnic and religious strife and political radicalisation. · Competition for energy resources is already a cause of conflict. This may get worse, not least "because much of the world's hydrocarbon reserves are in regions vulnerable to the impacts of climate change and because many oil and gas producing states already face significant social, economic and demographic challenges." Europe, the officials imply, needs to get its act together if there is to be any chance of managing the apocalyptic scenarios outlined. What the report does not say is that if demographics are any measure of potential power, Europe's task is that much harder.

The average European is currently aged 39 and Europeans, including Russians, make up some 11% of the world's population of 6.7 billion. By 2050 that figure will have shrunk to 7%, with the average age of Europeans being over 47 and the elderly outnumbering children by more than two to one. A weaker Europe may have to cope with the challenges listed by Solana and Ferrero-Waldner, but environmental migrants may enlarge and rejuvenate its population.

Areas under threat

The Arctic The speed of polar ice cap melting will have a large geostrategic impact, with conflicts likely over the vast new mineral resources that will become accessible, as well as the opening of new sea routes for international trade.

Rival claims to the mineral wealth and shipping routes will challenge Europe's ability to secure its interests in the region. Latin America The Caribbean and central America are already badly affected by major hurricanes and extreme weather linked with El Niño. This will get worse, while weak governments will struggle to cope with social and political tension fuelled by climate change.

Africa Particularly vulnerable because of its low ability to cope with climate change, which is already a factor contributing to the Darfur catastrophe and conflict in the Horn of Africa. Three-quarters of arable rain-fed land in north Africa and the Sahel could be lost. Some 5 million people in the Nile delta could be affected by land losses due to rising sea levels and salinisation by 2050. Central Asia Trouble ahead. The authoritarian regimes of the region will become increasingly important because of mineral wealth.

But climate change means water shortages are already being felt. Kyrgyzstan has lost 1,000 glaciers over the past 40 years, while Tajikistan's glaciers have shrunk by one third. Farming and power generation are already being hit by water shortages. Middle East Water systems are already under intense stress, with around two-thirds of the Arab world dependent on water sources beyond their borders.

Water supply might fall by 60% this century in Israel. Significant decreases expected to hit Turkey, Iraq, Syria and Saudi Arabia, further destabilising the "vitally strategic region". South Asia Almost two billion Asians live within 35 miles of a coast and many of them are likely to be threatened by rising sea levels. Damage to farming will make it difficult to feed rapidly swelling populations.

Another billion people will be affected by a drop in meltwater from the Himalayas. These vulnerable populations will also be exposed to an increase in infectious diseases.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/mar/10/climatechange.eu
Westar to Explore Renewables, Efficiency Programs
Copyright Environment News Service (ENS) 2008. All rights reserved.

OSLO, Norway, March 6, 2008 (ENS) - Solving four major environmental problems - climate change, biodiversity loss, water scarcity, and the health impacts of pollution and toxics - is both achievable and affordable, finds a new report by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, OECD, which includes 30 countries committed to democracy and the market economy.

The 2008 OECD Environmental Outlook marries economic and environmental projections through 2030 and offers specific policies to address these challenges.

Angel Gurria of Mexico is Secretary General of the OECD. (Photo courtesy OECD)

"Solutions to the key environmental challenges are available, achievable and affordable, especially when compared to the expected economic growth and the costs and consequences of inaction," OECD Secretary General Angel Gurria said at the worldwide launch of the report in Oslo, hosted by Norwegian Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg. "The Outlook is an impressive body of work.

It combines hope for the future with an urgent call for action today. It offers important guidance for decision-makers and integrates economic and environmental analysis," said Prime Minister Stoltenberg. Economic-environmental projections show that global greenhouse gas emissions are expected to grow by 37 percent to 2030 and by 52 percent to 2050 if no new policy action is introduced.

To meet increasing demands for food and biofuels, world agricultural land use will need to expand by an estimated 10 percent to 2030, the report projects. Water scarcity will worsen due to unsustainable use and management of the resource as well as climate change until one billion more people will be living in areas of severe water stress by 2030 than today, the OECD warns.

Premature deaths caused by ground-level ozone worldwide would quadruple by 2030, and in addition the report says, chemical production volumes in non-OECD countries are rapidly increasing, and there is insufficient information to fully assess the risks of chemicals in the environment and in products.

Drought has ruined this corn crop (Photo courtesy Fullerton College)

A considerable number of today's known animal and plant species are likely to be extinct, largely due to expanding infrastructure and agriculture, as well as climate change, the report warns, saying, "Continued loss of biodiversity is likely to limit the Earth's capacity to provide the valuable ecosystem services that support economic growth and human well-being." "Countries will need to shift the structure of their economies in order to move towards a low carbon, greener and more sustainable future.

The costs of this restructuring are affordable, but the transition will need to be managed carefully to address social and competitiveness impacts, and to take advantage of new opportunities," said Secretary-General Gurría. The 2008 OECD Environmental Outlook projects that world GDP will almost double by 2030.

The OECD policy simulation shows that it would cost just over one percent of that growth to implement policies that can cut key air pollutants by about a third, and contain greenhouse gas emissions to about 12 percent instead of 37 percent growth under the scenario without new policies.

To keep the costs of action low, the OECD recommends using economic and market-based instruments such as green taxes, efficient water pricing, emissions trading, polluter pay systems, and waste charges.

The elimination of environmentally harmful subsidies for fossil fuels and agriculture is also recommended. In addition, more stringent regulations and standards for transport and building construction, investment in research and development, sectoral and voluntary approaches, as well as eco-labelling and information are also needed, the OECD advises.

Meltwater stream flowing off the Greenland ice sheet (Photo by Roger Braithwaite, University of Manchester courtesy NASA)

Technological developments will contribute to the solutions but Gurría said the generalized application of breakthrough technologies poses important challenges in the area of intellectual property rights which will have to be confronted.

The Outlook identifies ways to share the cost of policy action globally. Developed nations have been responsible for the majority of greenhouse gas emissions to date, but rapid economic growth in emerging economies - particularly Brazil, Russia, India and China - means that by 2030 the annual emissions of these four countries together will exceed those of the 30 OECD countries combined.

"Fair burden-sharing and distributional aspects will be as important as technological progress and the choice of policy instruments," the OECD says in its report. "While OECD countries should take the lead, further co-operation with a wider group of emerging economies, the "BRIICS" countries (Brazil, Russia, India, Indonesia, China and South Africa) in particular, can achieve common environmental goals at lower costs," the report states.

"We must be aware that getting it right in the field of the environment is not only about what to do and how to do it. We also need to address the question of who will pay for what," Gurría said. "The global cost of action will be much lower if all countries work together."

Highlights of the report are online at: www.oecd.org/environment/outlookto2030.

http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/mar2008/2008-03-06-01.asp
Flooded Village Files Suit, Citing Corporate Link to Climate Change
By FELICITY BARRINGER
Published: February 27, 2008
  SAN FRANCISCO — Lawyers for the Alaska Native coastal village of Kivalina, which is being forced to relocate because of flooding caused by the changing Arctic climate, filed suit in federal court here Tuesday arguing that 5 oil companies, 14 electric utilities and the country’s largest coal company were responsible for the village’s woes.

Flooding is forcing Kivalina, Alaska, to relocate.

The suit is the latest effort to hold companies like BP America, Chevron, Peabody Energy, Duke Energy and the Southern Company responsible for the impact of global warming because they emit millions of tons of greenhouse gases, or, in the case of Peabody, mine and market carbon-laden coal that is burned by others.

It accused the companies of creating a public nuisance.

In an unusual move, those five companies and three other defendants — the Exxon Mobil Corporation, American Electric Power and the Conoco Phillips Company — are also accused of conspiracy.

“There has been a long campaign by power, coal and oil companies to mislead the public about the science of global warming,” the suit says. The campaign, it says, contributed “to the public nuisance of global warming by convincing the public at large and the victims of global warming that the process is not man-made when in fact it is.” Kivalina, an Inupiat village of 400 people on a barrier reef between the Chukchi Sea and two rivers, is being buffeted by waves that, in colder times, were blocked by sea ice, the suit says.

“The result of the increased storm damage is a massive erosion problem,” it says. “Houses and buildings are in imminent danger of falling into the sea.” The estimated cost of relocating the village is up to $400 million, the suit says.

Some lawyers in the case participated in the long-running litigation against American tobacco companies in the 1990s, and some of the same legal theories echo through the complaint. But the hurdles may be greater than those in the tobacco wars.

Global warming is a diffuse worldwide phenomenon; a successful public nuisance case requires that defendants’ behavior be directly linked to the harm.

“Public nuisance law has been used from time immemorial to address issues that have not been addressed by the political branches,” said Kirsten H. Engel, a law professor at the University of Arizona.

But Professor Engel added, “It’s very difficult to get a court to jump in here and say that what these companies are doing, and have been doing for years, is unreasonable and creating a public nuisance.”

Two similar lawsuits, one brought by California against six automakers and another by a coalition of Eastern states against utility companies, have been dismissed by federal judges. Both judges said the issues involved were political and did not belong in the courts.

Those decisions have been appealed. Matt Pawa, a lawyer for Kivalina, said this case was different because it sought monetary damages for an injured party. “The kind of harms to property and public welfare caused by global warming are classic public nuisance injuries,” Mr. Pawa said. He added that the other cases had no conspiracy claims, which he said courts routinely addressed.

Reached late Tuesday, spokesmen for three defendants — Jason Cuevas of Southern, Vic Svec of Peabody and Gantt Walton of Exxon Mobil — said they would not comment on the substance of the lawsuit.

But Mr. Svec said, “Rather than unreasonably suing companies for the weather, we would encourage everyone to join Peabody in supporting aggressive development of carbon capture and storage projects and other technologies that help us provide both energy security and carbon solutions.”

Of the accusation that Exxon Mobil participated in a disinformation campaign, Mr. Walton said, “The recycling of this type of discredited conspiracy theory only diverts attention from the real challenge at hand — how to provide the energy to improve living standards while also reducing greenhouse gas emissions.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/27/us/27alaska.html?_r=4&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&adxnnlx=1205287630-4yORvPAhMKYj/kcKPw6DSw
scientists advance 'drought crop'
By Matt McGrath BBC News science reporter

Indian farmer waits for rain
For many, a drought means devastation as crops die

Scientists say they have made a key breakthrough in understanding the genes of plants that could lead to crops that can survive in a drought.

Researchers in Finland and the United States say they have discovered a gene that controls the amount of carbon dioxide a plant absorbs.

It also controls the amount of water vapour it releases into the atmosphere. This information could be important for food production and in regulating climate change.

Water control Plants play a crucial role in the regulation of the atmosphere by absorbing carbon dioxide from the air. They absorb the gas through tiny pores on their leaves called stomata and these pores also release water vapour as the plant grows. In extremely dry weather, a plant can lose 95% of its water in this way.
It opens the avenue, it is still several years away
Professor Jakko Kangasjarvi

Scientists have been trying to find the gene that controls the response of the stomata for decades.

Now teams in Finland and California are reporting in the journal Nature that they have found a crucial genetic pathway that controls the opening and closing of these pores.

The researchers say that this understanding could allow them to modify plants so that they continue to absorb carbon dioxide but reduce the amount of water released into the atmosphere, enabling them to thrive in very dry conditions.

On the way Professor Jakko Kangasjarvi from the University of Helsinki says this work is the first step on that road "It opens the avenue, it is still several years away but before this publication, there was no single component which would have so many different effects... there was no target to modify, now we know the target," he said.

While the experiments have been done in a variety of cress, the scientists say that the underlying genetic mechanisms are the same in many food plants, including rice. It is believed that this new genetic understanding of how to control the amount of water that plants use could be commercialised within the next 20 years.

 
Freshwater from Seawater
 
 
 
 
Fresh Water From Salt Water
Windmill With A Twist Can Provide Fresh Water From Seawater Directly

ScienceDaily (Mar. 5, 2008) — A traditional windmill which drives a pump: that is the simple concept behind the combination of windmill/reverse osmosis developed by the Delft University of Technology (TU Delft) in The Netherlands. In this case, it involves a high-pressure pump which pushes water through a membrane using approximately 60 bar.

This reverse osmosis membrane produces fresh water from seawater directly.

The windmill is suited for use by, for instance, small villages in isolated, dry coastal areas. The combination of windmills and desalination installations is already commercially available.

These windmills produce electricity from wind power, the electricity is stored and subsequently used to drive the high-pressure pump for the reverse osmosis installation. The storage of electricity in particular is very expensive. Energy is also lost during conversion. In the TU Delft installation, the high-pressure pump is driven directly by wind power.

Water storage can be used to overcome calm periods. The storage of water is after all a great deal cheaper than that of electricity.

Robust The chosen windmill is normally used for irrigation purposes. These windmills turn relatively slowly and are also very robust. On the basis of the windmill’s capacity at varying wind speeds, it is estimated that it will produce 5 to 10 m3 of fresh water per day: enough drinking water for a small village of 500 inhabitants.

A water reservoir will have to ensure that enough water is available for a calm period lasting up to five days. Three safeguards (in the event of the installation running dry, a low number of revolutions or a high number of revolutions) are also performed mechanically so that no electricity is needed.

Adapted from materials provided by Delft University of Technology.

A Drought-Proof Water Supply for Algiers

ALGIERS, Algeria, February 25, 2008 (ENS) - One of the largest seawater desalination plants in the world was officially opened in Algiers on Sunday by President Abdelaziz Bouteflika and a senior executive of the U.S.-based General Electric Company, which built and will operate the plant.

The new $250 million facility will supply the drought-stricken, thirsty millions of residents of this capital city by the sea. Constructed on a brownfield site just east of the Port of Algiers, the Hamma Seawater Desalination Plant purifies seawater with GE's proprietary reverse osmosis membranes, and the company says it can handle up to 53 million gallons of seawater a day.

This location was not chosen for the purity of its water, but for its infrastructure. "Although the water quality in this part of the bay can be affected by ship traffic and port activities, the site is ideal for its

Seawater is purified into drinking water at the Hamma Seawater Desalination Plant. (Photo courtesy GE)

proximity to the city's water distribution network, power grid, and transportation routes," GE says in a Hamma case study.

The plant will provide as many as two million residents of Algiers with a reliable supply of potable water, an increasingly scarce commodity to come by as rural residents have moved to the city in rising numbers over the past 50 years.

Water scarcity caused by demand, drought, and an aging, leaky distribution system has meant frequent water rationing. Sometimes the water has been running only one of every three days.

With few surface water sources, the Algerian government has invested in new dams to improve its rain catchment and storage capacity, but they have not been enough to meet demand, due to persistant drought.

Repairs to the city's water distribution system have cut water losses from 40 percent to less than 25 percent, but still water scarcity has been a daily trial for residents.

Completed on time and on budget in 24 months, the Hamma Seawater Desalination Plant is North Africa's first large-scale reverse osmosis desalination plant to be funded by a joint venture that combines public and private equity investment. The special project company, Hamma Water Desalination SpA, combines 70 percent funding from General Electric and 30 percent from the state-owned Algerian Energy Company, AEC.

“We are proud to be a partner in the Hamma Seawater Desalination Plant. It is a great example of how private and public partnerships can help solve urgent water needs," said Jeff Garwood president and chief executive of GE Water and Process Technologies, a unit of General Electric. At the opening ceremony on Sunday, Garwood said, "Partnerships like this one, with the Algerian Government and AEC, combined with our global scale, financing capabilities, and broad portfolio of equipment, chemicals and services put GE in a unique position to provide solutions for the world's growing water challenges."

GE holds a 25 year contract to operate and maintain the plant and is responsible for daily operations. The facility will draw in seawater through two 550-meter direct intake pipes to a pre-treatment system, where it will enter a clarifier and have coagulants added to help remove suspended solids and reduce biological challenges of the raw water.

"Seawater is affected by seasonal dynamics, biological blooms and turbidity affects from a working port," GE explains in a paper on the Hamma desalination project. But the company says the process at the Hamma plant is designed to handle "the potential variability in raw water quality."

So, following flocculation and settling, the water will pass through a dual media filter and enter a clearwell. Water from the clearwell will be pumped through five-micron cartridge filters before being distributed among nine trains of single-pass reverse osmosis membranes.

Remineralization and disinfection will be the final steps in the process before the water can enter the city's distribution system. GE says the Hamma's advanced membrane process needs less energy and uses lower chemical concentrations than alternatives such as thermal desalination.

Copyright Environment News Service (ENS) 2008. All rights reserved

Quote of the Week
The packaging for a microwavable "microwave" dinner is programmed for a shelf life of maybe six months, a cook time of two minutes and a landfill dead-time of centuries.  ~David Wann, Buzzworm, November 1990
Technology Corner
Biofuel - how do you get oil from Algae?

A startup's new process could make fuel from algae as cheap as petroleum. Solazyme, a startup based in South San Francisco, CA, has developed a new way to convert biomass into fuel using algae, and the method could lead to less expensive biofuels.

The company recently demonstrated its algae-based fuel in a diesel car, and in January, it announced a development and testing agreement with Chevron. Late last year, the company received a $2 million grant from the National Institute of Standards and Technology to develop a substitute for crude oil based on algae.

The new process combines genetically modified strains of algae with an uncommon approach to growing algae to reduce the cost of making fuel. Rather than growing algae in ponds or enclosed in plastic tubes that are exposed to the sun, as other companies are trying to do, Solazyme grows the organisms in the dark, inside huge stainless-steel containers.

The company's researchers feed algae sugar, which the organisms then convert into various types of oil. The oil can be extracted and further processed to make a range of fuels, including diesel and jet fuel, as well as other products.

The company uses different strains of algae to produce different types of oil. Some algae produce triglycerides such as those produced by soybeans and other oil-rich crops. Others produce a mix of hydrocarbons similar to light crude petroleum.

Solazyme's method has advantages over other approaches that use microorganisms to convert sugars into fuel. The most common approaches use microorganisms such as yeast to ferment sugars, forming ethanol.

The oils made by Solazyme's algae can then be used for a wider range of products than ethanol, says Harrison Dillon, the company's president and chief technology officer. What's more, the algae has a particular advantage over many other microorganisms when it comes to processing sugars from cellulosic sources, such as grass and wood chips.

Such cellulosic sources require less energy, land, and water to grow than corn grain, the primary source of biofuel in the United States. But when biomass is broken down into sugars, it still contains substances such as lignin that can poison other microorganisms.

In most other processes, lignin has to be separated from the sugars to keep the microorganisms healthy. But the tolerance of the algae to lignin makes it possible to skip this step, which can reduce costs.

The process also has significant advantages over a quite different way of using algae to create biofuels--one that makes use of algae's ability to employ sunlight to produce their own supply of sugar, using photosynthesis. In these approaches, the algae are grown in ponds or bioreactors where they are exposed to sunlight and make their own sugar.

In Solazyme's approach, the researchers deliberately turn off photosynthetic processes by keeping the algae in the dark. Instead of getting energy from sunlight, the algae get energy from the sugars that the researchers feed them.

Solazyme's process of growing the algae in the dark has a couple of advantages over approaches that use ponds or bioreactors. First, keeping the algae in the dark causes them to produce more oil than they do in the light. That's because while their photosynthetic processes are inactive, other metabolic processes that convert sugar into oil become active. Just as important, feeding algae sugar makes it possible to grow them in concentrations that are orders of magnitude higher than when they're grown in ponds using energy from the sun, says Eric Jarvis, a biofuels researcher at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, in Golden, CO. (Jarvis is not connected to Solazyme.)

That's in part because the sugar provides a concentrated source of energy. These higher concentrations reduce the amount of infrastructure needed to grow the algae, and also make it much easier to collect the algae and extract the oil, Jarvis says, significantly reducing costs. High capital costs have so far stymied other attempts to make fuel from algae.

In spite of these advantages over other approaches, Solazyme's method for creating fuel is not yet cheap enough to compete with fuels made from petroleum, Dillon says. Indeed, Jarvis warns that one of the most expensive parts of making fuels from cellulosic sources is processing them to create simple sugars, a part of the process that Solazyme isn't focused on improving. But in the past 18 months, improvements in the amount of oil that the algae produce have convinced the company that competitive costs are within reach. Solazyme hopes to begin selling its fuel in two to three years, Dillon says.

Cultivating Algae for Liquid Fuel Production Thomas F. Riesing, Ph.D.

WITH THE INCREASING INTEREST in biodiesel as an alternative to petrodiesel, many have looked at the possibility of growing more oilseed crops as a solution to the problem of peak oil.

There are two problems with this approach: first, growing more oilseed crops would displace the food crops grown to feed mankind. Second, traditional oilseed crops are not the most productive or efficient source of vegetable oil.

Micro-algae is, by a factor of 8 to 25 for palm oil. and a factor of 40 to 120 for rapeseed, the highest potential energy yield temperate vegetable oil crop. Michael Briggs at the Univ. of N. Hampshire Biodiesel group estimates that using open. outdoor, racetrack ponds, only 15,000 square miles could produce enough algae to meet all of the USA's ground transportation needs. Transportation accounts for 67% of US oil consumption according to the Atlantic Monthly, July/August 2005.

We'll say more about the 15,000 square mile number below. If all of this land were in one rectangular piece, it would be 120 miles by 125 miles—about 1/7th of the area of the state of Colorado.

Gallons of Oil per

Acre per Year

Corn 18
Soybeans 48
Safflower 83
Sunflower 102
Rapeseed 127
Oil Palm 635
Micro Algae 5000-15000

 

A GreenFuel Technologies bioreactor in operation. Photos courtesy GreenFuel Technologies.

GreenFuel estimates that 70% of the power plants in the United States have enough space and 'food' to install a full complement of Bioreactor arrays. In the United States about 60% of the oil we use is for ground transportation—cars, vans, and trucks—while only about 25% is used as electricity.

 

Greenhouses can be modified to produce algae all year round. The surface area limitation which applies to ponds could be overcome in a greenhouse by adding a third layer of plastic inside the other two layers over which the pond water could flow in a thin enough film that it would receive enough solar radiation to grow algae.

This should allow the SolaroofTM greenhouse to produce more algae than the surface area of a normal pond would. This mechanism for exposing the pond water to sunlight is similar to that employed by GreenFuel Technologies. The greenhouse would also overcome two problems observed in the ASP trials in outdoor ponds—the greenhouse allows for better control of both the temperature and the air in the greenhouse.

This should allow optimum growth as well as eliminate the possibility of contamination with local algae. For small-scale operations to be effective, local co-operative biodiesel processing plants would also have to be constructed to convert the raw oil into fuel. A biodiesel cooperative in LaPlata County, Colorado, just completed a feasibility study that found it feasible to construct a 1-million gallon processing facility there to provide biodiesel for the county and a handful of other large users. Conclusions

The research work carried out by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory seems to be on the verge of paying off. The bioreactors developed by GreenFuel Technologies could substantially reduce power plant carbon emissions. The biodiesel that these reactors produce could potentially replace 20-25% of the petroleum-based fuel used for transportation. If the GreenFuel technology can be adapted to greenhouses, they could become a small-scale, highly distributed source of fuel oil and perhaps prevent the emergence of a new fuel monopoly like Big Oil.


Daily Energy Prices
New Zealand Daily Storage Graph