Welcome
|
Welcome to the first 2008 two weekly review of energy and environmental events and developments from both here in New Zealand and on an international basis.
As always we hope you find our collection of stories to be of interest in what continues to be an evolving market.
First up, New Zealand is moving to develop an expansive GHG emissions scheme - starting with oil, gas and coal companies requiring carbon credits to offset GHG emissions from their products.
The Court of Appeal has overturned a High Court ruling to allow Genesis Energy to develop a Gas fired power station at Kaipara Harbour (Rodney) - security of supply appears to be the driving factor in this decision.
Some Corporates are taking environmental responsibility beyond what one would expect of such organisations. Honda, Continental Airlines, Suncor, Tesco, Alcan, PG&E, S.C. Johnson, Goldman Sachs, Swiss Re, and Hewlett Packard are all reported as leading their respective markets with respect to the environment.
Meanwhile,
The World watch Institute has identified an increase in funding within green technologies, however it maintains a dark outlook on the environmental state of Planet Earth.
In Australia, plastic shopping bags are to be phased out by the end of 2008, whilst in Ireland inefficient light bulbs are to be phased out, providing an estimated EUR180M of savings to Irish consumers p.a.
Over the Christmas break I was looking after a house with a fancy European Dishwasher - the Europeans say "...don't rinse - let the dishwasher do all the work..." - how can that be - we rinse our recycling - and that goes out the door?
Melissa Breyer of Care2 Green Living discusses dish-washing.
This week in the Technology Corner - Solar Technology
|
|
New Zealand emissions trading scheme gets tough on farming emissions
Zara Maung, editor
| 12 Dec 07
One year from now New Zealand will start introducing the strictest emissions scheme in the world
New Zealand is about to embark on the most comprehensive emissions reduction programme in the world, affecting all sources of its domestic greenhouse gas emissions.
Instead of capping the emissions of heavy industry – like the European trading scheme – New Zealand will take an upstream approach. From January 2009 oil companies, and from January 2010 gas and coal companies, will be required to buy carbon credits from the CDM and the domestic market to offset all the greenhouse gas emissions released from their products.
“We have learnt valuable lessons from the European scheme – namely that energy providers automatically pass the costs of carbon allowances to consumers,” says Mark Storey, from the New Zealand treasury.
The New Zealand approach to emissions trading will work on the principle that higher brown energy prices will drive energy efficiency and clean technology in all sectors of the nation’s economy.
Free credits
Heavy industry will be allocated free carbon credits, or New Zealand units (NZUs), to sell on the domestic carbon market until January 2010 in order to soften the blow of passed on energy costs. However, New Zealand plans to gradually phase out these free credits altogether by 2025.
Meanwhile New Zealand’s domestic fuel users will be expected to take on all of the passed on costs, meaning higher petrol prices. Electricity prices will not suffer as much, as New Zealand already generates 70% of its electricity from hydropower.
Five sectors of the New Zealand economy will feel the impact of the new trading scheme. These include industries usually associated with the burning of fossil fuels: the transport sector, heavy industry, and domestic/business energy users; as well as two less usual additions: agriculture and forestry.
Out of the woods
Whilst New Zealand’s forests planted after 1990 will help to absorb carbon dioxide in the first Kyoto period until 2012, they are due to release carbon dioxide between 2020 and 2033, when the matured trees are scheduled to be felled.
Participation in the emissions trading scheme will be voluntary for foresters, starting in January 2008, whereby they will receive credits for the trees they plant or that remain unfelled, and pay for credits for trees they cut down.
Largely due to the potent greenhouse gas effect of the methane released by farm animals, New Zealand’s agricultural sector emits more greenhouse gases than all of the nation’s fossil fuel emissions combined.
Agriculture is due to be included on a mandatory level into the emissions trading scheme in 2013. Farmers will receive free NZUs to sell on the domestic market to compensate them for 90% of their 2005 emissions.
Farmers’ task
By 2025, however, the government plans to reduce these credits to zero. Making farmers pay to offset their entire emissions has been one of the most controversial aspects of the trading scheme, according to Storey. He says it is going to be one of the hardest parts of the scheme to push through.
Storey is not concerned that including farmers in the trading scheme will affect their competitiveness, however. “The dairy industry is doing very well… our farmers are extremely efficient,” he explains. So efficient, he says, that agriculture receives no government subsidies in New Zealand.
Methane deadline
Farmers have a long and difficult road ahead before achieving carbon neutral status in 2025. No commercial technologies yet exist to reduce methane from farm animals. The agricultural industry has been granted five years to find and commercialise workable emissions-reducing technologies before it becomes part of the scheme.
New Zealand will be looking to alleviate concerns about food miles, raised by trade ministers at this weekend’s UNFCCC meetings. Pioneering the technologies to reduce methane emissions from farm animals, one of the world’s largest source of GHG emissions, will go a long way to securing New Zealand’s future as a global supplier of agricultural goods. The country’s new emissions trading scheme does not include international aviation or marine transport, however, the justification being that neither is part of the Kyoto agreement.
Some other NZ climate targets:
– generate 90% of its electricity from renewable sources by 2025
- halve GHG gases by 2040
– pioneer mainstream use of electric cars
– cut per capita transport emissions in half by 2040
– stimulate growth in the CDM market by requiring companies to purchase CDMs (between 7-17 euros per tonne carbon equivalent saved)
– possible linkage to a future Australian mandatory market
NZ ETS omissions:
– aviation/marine transport (although they may be hit by higher fuel prices)
– HFC refrigerant emissions, potent greenhouse gases from fridges and air conditioning. Alternative refrigerants exist. According to Brent Hoare from the Natural Refrigerants Transition Board, a conference attendee: “HFCs aren’t low hanging fruit, they’re ankle hanging”.
See this factsheet by Greenpeace for info on HFCs.
http://www.climatechangecorp.com/content.asp?ContentID=5061
|
|
| Rodney gas-fired power project may go ahead
NZPA | Wednesday, 12 December 2007
The Court of Appeal says a controversial gas-fired power plant north of Auckland, on the edge of the Kaipara Harbour at Rodney, may yet go ahead.
"We have been told that the application remains alive and is being processed," the court said yesterday in a judgment overturning a High Court ruling that climate change and greenhouse gas emissions could be a consideration in consents under the Resource Management Act.
"In considering the application by Genesis Power for a discharge permit into the air of greenhouse gases associated with the proposed Rodney power station, the Auckland Regional Council must not have regard to the effects of that discharge on climate change," the appeal court ruled.
Energy Minister David Parker claimed in October that state-owned generators - including Genesis - have been told not to proceed with any plans to add thermal power generators to their baseload ability.
And after Prime Minister Helen Clark said she wanted the sector to focus on renewable energy unless new coal and gas fired stations were needed to ensure security of supply, Mr Parker said the strategy spelt the end of the road for the Rodney plant.
Finance Minister Michael Cullen also questioned how Genesis' gas-fired plant at Rodney would get the go-ahead under the new energy strategy "unless there was an absolutely clear offset against higher emitting thermal capacity elsewhere".
The appeal court said environmental lobby Greenpeace "points to the conflict between unequivocal assertions made by cabinet ministers to the effect that the Rodney project is off, and Genesis Power's position that it is not necessarily off".
It said that the Government's policy - and legislation introduced last week for a 10-year ban on new fossil-fuel power stations - does "not exclude the reasonable possibility that the application will proceed".
The court, Justices Bruce Robertson and Robert Chambers with Justice William Young presiding, noted the "opaque nature of the material supplied by Genesis Power" left it to assume no decision had been made on canning the project.
They noted eventual construction of the power station might be more 10 years away, and so not in conflict with government policy, or it could be built sooner as a peak-load generator, and still not conflict with the Government's ban on new fossil-fuel generation.
Greenpeace won the original High Court ruling that climate change could be considered in RMA consents for such projects.
The High Court said that regional councils considering resource consents for Mighty River Power's plans to convert the Marsden B power station in Northland to run on coal could take climate change into account.
Since the ruling in October last year, Mighty River Power has abandoned its plans for the conversion.
But Genesis began legal moves in May to reverse the High Court decision, saying such a declaration would help it gain resource consents for its planned gas-fired Rodney generators.
Genesis also runs Huntly power station, one of the nation's biggest sources of greenhouse gases from an industrial site.
Greenpeace climate campaigner Susannah Bailey said the appeal court ruling has removed a crucial legal control on polluters' greenhouse gas emissions in New Zealand.
"The court action undertaken by a state owned enterprise (SOE) - whose shareholders are government ministers - used public money to remove the only existing legal protection for the climate in New Zealand and to have the effects of the greenhouse gases it discharges deemed irrelevant under the law," she said.
"It's extremely embarrassing for a Government trying to push its green credentials and "carbon neutral" aspirations, both here and abroad."
The Government's proposed moratorium on new fossil fuel generation was only for 10 years and had loopholes which could allow new polluting thermal plants to continue to be built.
"Right now, it seems like business as usual," said Ms Bailey.
"The Court of Appeal ruling has created a legal vacuum which could allow millions of tonnes of greenhouse gases to be emitted".
She called on the Government to support the Green Party's bill to amend the RMA, and implement a national policy statement to promote renewable energy and a shift away from fossil fuels.
"Greenpeace is currently reviewing whether to appeal the ruling at the Supreme Court," said Ms Bailey. "We will continue to fight to ensure there are no legal loopholes in terms of climate protection."
http://stuff.co.nz/dominionpost/4320286a6034.html
Top |
|
|
10 Green Giants
These companies have gone beyond what the law requires to operate in an environmentally responsible way
Honda Location: Japan Year founded: 1945 Revenue: $84.2 Billion Employees: 145,000 The most fuel-efficient auto company in the U.S.
While other automakers gripe, Honda attacks the issues of fuel economy and emissions with relish. Working independently, it is focusing on two alternative fuel technologies, the natural gas powered "Civic GX" and the hydrogen fuel cell "FCX." Honda has also taken a crack at solving a problem other automakers have left to the oil companies: creating an infrastructure for hydrogen. Honda's solution is for individual refueling stations that provide heat and electricity for the home as well as hydrogen for a fuel-cell-powered car. Long term, Honda wants to be the world's cleanest, most efficient manufacturer. It has promised to reduce CO2 emissions from its factories as well as its vehicles by 5 percent between 2005 and 2010 - on top of the 5 percent it achieved between 2000 and 2005. --Alex Taylor III
|
The Adams family of New Jersey - Kimberly, Eric and young Alice - are attached to their Civic GX natural gas vehicle, which they can refuel at home with Phill by FuelMaker.
|
|
| Continental Airlines
Location: Houston
Year founded: 1934 Revenue: $13.1 Billion Employees: 44,000 Worked with Boeing to engineer more fuel-efficient aircraft.
AMID RISING concern about aviation pollution, British Airways introduced a "CO2 emission calculator" on its website, letting passengers pay to offset the carbon dioxide generated by their flights. Lufthansa recently equipped an Airbus A340 with a 1.5-ton mobile laboratory to track gases and compounds. But it is American airline Continental that's gone furthest to green operations. Besides spending more than $16 billion over the past ten years to replace its fleet with more efficient aircraft, it installed fuel-saving winglets that reduce emissions by up to 5% on most of its Boeing 737s and 757s, and reduced the nitrogen oxide output from ground equipment at its Houston hub by over 75% since 2000. Its 13 full-time staff environmentalists work with engine manufacturers, design green terminals, and track carbon emissions and chemical recycling daily. Even all the trash from company headquarters is later sorted for recyclables. --Barney Gimbel
|
By washing the interior of this jet engine, Continental workers make flight more efficient.
|
|
| Suncor
Location: Canada
Year founded: 1917 Revenue: $13.6 Billion Employees: 5,500 Measures the environmental impact of each project.
Finding black gold is a dirty job - particularly when it's buried in tar sands. But Suncor still stands out for how it does the job. Its environmental and social efforts have earned it membership in the Dow Jones sustainability index and the British equivalent, the FTSE4Good. In a survey of 23 global oil companies last year, Jantzi Research, a Canadian consultancy, named Suncor a top performer, noting its environmental and greenhouse-gas management programs. Specifically, it has improved emissions intensity (the amount of oil it extracts per ton of greenhouse gases emitted) 25 percent since 1990. Ditto for energy, sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide. Suncor is part of an initiative to develop carbon-capture techniques. And while Suncor hopes to double its production by 2012, its water management is so advanced that it expects to draw no additional water from Alberta's Athabasca River.
|
Suncor's Commerce City, Colorado, refinery was recently upgraded to meet clean fuels regulations and handle a wider range of oil sands products.
|
|
| Tesco
Location: Britain
Year founded: 1919 Revenue: $71 Billion Employees: 380,000 Cut energy use and is trying to get customers to think green.
Wind-powered stores, high-tech recycling, biodiesel delivery trucks - Tesco does all that. Last year the company pledged to cut the average energy use in its British buildings in half by 2010; now it says it will get there two years early. State-of-the-art trains that have lower-than-normal noise and pollution reduce the use of trucks, slashing thousands of tons of carbon dioxide emissions; in a major store initiative, Tesco will estimate the "carbon costs" of each item. To ensure that its leadership walks the talk, Tesco now determines senior-management bonuses partly on meeting energy- and waste-reduction targets. Tesco is also encouraging customers to be greener by awarding points, redeemable for merchandise, to those who bring their own reusable shopping bags. --Matthew Boyle
|
Many Tesco stores, like this one in Evesham, offer savings incentives to encourage their customers to save energy.
|
|
| Alcan
Location: Canada
Year founded: 1902 Revenue: $23.6 Billion Employees: 68,000 Investing in clean, efficient manufacturing
When Alcan took over French rival Pechiney in late 2003, the Montreal-based aluminum maker also landed world-class smelting technology. Because of Pechiney's proprietary methods (and an aggressive push by Alcan to track emissions), the company has been able to reduce its greenhouse-gas output by 25 percent since 1990, while production increased 40 percent. Alcan's latest goal is to install a high-capacity process that increases energy efficiency by as much as 20 percent and lowers emissions. A pilot plant in Quebec is already under construction. "It's inherent to the engineering culture to respond to problems like these," says Alcan's Corey Copeland. "It's what makes engineers tick." --Jia Lynn Yang
|
Alcan has reduced greenhouse gas emissions from its aluminum smelting plants by 25 percent since 1990, while increasing production.
|
|
| PG&E
Location: San Francisco
Year founded: 1852 Revenue: $12.5 Billion Employees: 20,000 Strategic investments in efficiency and renewables.
PG&E Played a big role in getting mandatory controls on greenhouse gases enacted last year in California, and CEO Peter Darbee is now pushing for federal legislation.
The utility generates 56 percent of its retail electricity sales from non-greenhouse-gas-emitting sources, and it aggressively helps customers become more efficient. For instance, it subsidizes homeowners who buy energy-efficient appliances with $75 grants. PG&E is also experimenting with a variety of clean power alternatives. It is seeking permission to develop generation projects that could convert wave energy off the Pacific Coast into electricity. It is bullish on solar thermal technology, and it has a pilot project in the San Joaquin Valley in which cow manure is turned into electricity. "That's a dung good idea," cracks Darbee.
Jokes aside, Darbee is seriously excited about the prospect of plug-in hybrids that would draw power from the electricity grid at night and then feed power back into the grid during the day when demand peaks. These clean cars would burn less gasoline, pollute less and take advantage of the utility industry's capital-intensive infrastructure. "The energy industry," Darbee concludes, "is on the brink of a revolution." --Marc Gunther
|
The methane byproduct of these California cows' waste is delivered by pipeline to PG&E and turned into electricity.
|
|
| S.C. Johnson
Location: Racine, Wis.
Year founded: 1886 Revenue: $7 Billion Employees: 12,000 Three generations of committed environmental stewardship.
In 1935, long before sustainability became a corporate buzzword, H.F. Johnson Jr. led a 15,000-mile expedition to Brazil in search of a sustainable source of wax, the carnauba palm tree, for his company's first product, Johnson's Wax.
His grandson and the current CEO, Fisk Johnson, has continued that legacy at S.C. Johnson, a family-owned company that makes Windex, Pledge, Ziploc bags and Raid. Its most notable innovation is its Greenlist process, a classification system that evaluates the impact of thousands of raw materials on human and environmental health. By using Greenlist, S.C. Johnson eliminated 1.8 million pounds of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from Windex and four million pounds of polyvinylidene chloride (PVDC) from Saran Wrap, which is now PVDC-free. (VOCs and PVDC are both pollutants.) The company licenses Greenlist royalty-free to other firms that want to use it. It is also cutting back its reliance on coal-fired power, recently building its own power plant that runs on natural gas and methane piped in from a nearby landfill. Glenn Pricket of Conservation International says that when it comes to the environment, "Fisk Johnson is probably the most personally committed CEO I've met." --Marc Gunther
|
S.C. Johnson has eliminated millions of pounds of pollutants from products like Windex and Raid through its Greenlist process.
|
|
| Goldman Sachs
Location: New York
Year founded: 1869 Revenue: $69.4 Billion Employees: 24,000 Bold climate-change policy shapes major investments.
When Goldman Sachs announced a groundbreaking environmental policy in 2005, critics said chief executive Hank Paulson was imposing his green ethos. Wrong. The bank has become even more planet-friendly since Paulson left. Why? Because it is doing lots of green business.
Goldman's investment of $1.5 billion in cellulosic ethanol, wind and solar have paid off. Texas Pacific and Kohlberg Kravis Roberts turned to Goldman, which had built bridges to environmental groups, as they prepared a bid for Texas energy company TXU. Research clients are pleased that Goldman's equity analysts in Europe now factor environmental, social and governance issues into their reports. "The world's changing," says one Goldman official. The company is too - some cars that take bankers home are hybrids. --Marc Gunther
|
Goldman invested $1.5 billion in cellulosic ethanol, wind and solar power.
|
|
| Swiss Re
Location: Switzerland
Year founded: 1863 Revenue: $24 Billion Employees: 10,500 Developing financial tools to deal with the risks of climate change.
Swiss Re's main product is insurance for insurers, so its products never come near a smokestack. And Swiss reinsurance companies are not exactly known for boldness. Even so, Swiss Re has been way ahead of the pack on climate change, warning as early as 1994 about the bottom-line threat in the form of higher claims from storms and other weather-related disasters.
In addition, Swiss Re has pioneered products like weather-based derivatives to hedge these risks. Buyers can bet on future heat waves or cold snaps with puts and calls on specific periods of time and temperatures, much as conventional options have a preset strike price for a stock. So a farmer in India might be able to buy insurance from a local insurer in case the usual monsoon rains fail to arrive or, conversely, his fields are flooded. Swiss Re was also among the early supporters of the Chicago Climate Exchange, an emerging hub for traders in derivatives linked to carbon emissions. --Nelson D. Schwartz
|
Swiss Re predicted that climate change would cause weather related distaters like hurricanes, floods and tornados, and sells derivatives to hedge those risks.
|
|
| Hewlett-Packard
Location: Palo Alto
Year founded: 1939 Revenue: $91.7 Billion Employees: 156,000 Silicon Valley's longtime industry leader in eco-sensitivity.
High tech is falling all over itself to go green. It may be that Prius-driving engineering types are more eco-sensitive than the rest of us, or maybe they're simply battling for competitive advantage. The fact is, as more of modern life goes digital, the environmental impact of those computers and gadgets has gone from negligible to considerable. Hewlett-Packard has done the most to mitigate that. HP owns massive e-waste recycling plants, where enormous shredders and granulators reduce four million pounds of computer detritus each month to bite-sized chunks - the first step in reclaiming not just steel and plastic but also toxic chemicals like mercury and even some precious metals. HP will take back any brand of equipment; its own machines are 100 percent recyclable. It has promised to cut energy consumption by 20 percent by 2010. HP also audits its top suppliers for eco-friendliness, and its omnibus Global Citizenship Report sets the standard for detailed environmental accountability. --Oliver Ryan
|
At the HP recycling plant in Sacramento, computer parts get a new start in life.
|
http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2007/fortune/0703/gallery.green_giants.fortune/index.html
Top |
|
| |
|
|
State of the World 2008: Environmental Woes Sow Seeds of Sustainability
By J.R. Pegg
WASHINGTON, DC, January 10, 2008 (ENS) – Concern about environmental degradation is beginning to impact the global economy, according to a new report by an international environmental research group.
The Worldwatch Institute details a lengthy and distressing list of environmental problems caused by the global economic system, but finds some evidence that the world is taking small steps toward a sustainable future.
 |
| Worldwatch president Christopher Flavin (Photo courtesy ENB) |
"There are early signs that a vibrant, new sustainable economy is just beginning to be created," Worldwatch president Christopher Flavin told reporters Wednesday at the launch of the organization's annual "State of the World" report.
The report details how the conventional economic system is inherently self-destructive, failing to take into account the damage done to the environment by a wide range of human activities that create wealth.
But it suggests that is beginning to change.
The world's leading corporations and investors are beginning to realize "the tremendous risks" that environmental degradation and climate change pose, Flavin explained, and starting to respond to growing demand for greener policies and technologies.
The report estimates that more than $100 billion of annual investment is directly related to environmental concerns.
 |
| Wind turbines at Middelgrunden two kilometers off shore east of Copenhagen, Denmark. (Photo courtesy DWIA) |
Some $52 billion was invested in renewable energy in 2006, according to figures in the report, a 33 percent rise from 2005.
That figure seems to have jumped to $66 billion last year, Worldwatch says, and is set to rise again this year. The report also estimates carbon markets tripled in 2006 to some $30 billion.
The report notes that major corporations have taken significant steps to improve their environmental performance - largely because they have realized it is a way to save money.
"Reducing wastes typically means reducing costs and companies are increasingly finding this out," said Gary Gardner, one of the report's lead authors.
Gardner highlighted how chemical giant DuPont has cut its greenhouse gas emissions some 72 percent in the past 16 years and saved $3 billion in the process.
"Those numbers talk … and get the attention of businesses," Gardner said at Wednesday's press briefing in Washington DC.
Clean technology is now the third largest recipient of venture capital, the report says, and new renewable energy laws and climate policies in China and Europe will "ensure these kinds of investments will continue to flow for many years to come."
Furthermore, a majority of the world's largest banks have endorsed new sustainable investment principles and many have announced major investments to tackle environmental concerns, according to the report.
"Innovative ideas and big money are a powerful combination," Worldwatch says, "and the sums now moving in a green direction are eye-popping."
Financial giant Citigroup pledged $50 billion last year to address climate change over the next decade, the report notes, and Goldman Sachs invested $1.5 billion in renewable energy technologies in 2006.
 |
| An array of Pelamis wave energy converters off the coast of Portugal (Photo courtesy Frazer-Nash) |
"An extraordinary wave of innovation is being released," Flavin told reporters. "There has been a real awakening in the past two years … Can this wave of innovation be accelerated to the point where we have a chance of turning around the huge environmental challenges that we now face?"
"The only honest answer," he said, "is that the jury is still out."
The 2008 State of the World report is Worldwatch's 25th annual assessment of global environmental conditions. Although it offers an upbeat message about green innovation, much of the report presents a sobering and worrying assessment of the state of the world's environment, highlighting how economic indicators currently fail to adequately consider environmental degradation.
Nowhere is this more evident than climate change, the report's authors note, citing former World Bank chief economist Lord Nicholas Stern's comment that the impacts of rising greenhouse gases caused by human activities represent "the greatest and widest-ranging market failure ever seen.
"
In the "Stern Review," a report issued in October 2006, Stern warned that unabated climate change will cause profound impacts to societies and ecosystems across the planet and could cost the world five to 20 percent of gross domestic product, GDP, annually.
The market failure described by Stern is one "the global economy is not prepared to cope with and that most of today's economic analysis is not able to understand," according to Flavin.
In fact, widely used economic indicators such as GDP fail to consider how nature benefits humanity, the report explains, or the economic costs of environmental degradation, whether it be unsustainable logging, air pollution or adverse impacts to water quality.
 |
| Nanosolar's newSolarPly™ light-weight solar-electric cell foil which can be cut to any size. It is non-fragile and no soldering is required for electrical contact. (Photo courtesy Nanosolar) |
That must change, Flavin declared."Continued human progress now depends on an economic transformation that is more profound than any seen in the last century,"
Flavin said.
"We should be practicing a sustainable approach to economics that takes advantage of the ability of markets to allocate scarce resources while explicitly recognizing that our economy is dependent on the broader ecosystem that contains it."
A growing number of countries are beginning to consider and implement "green accounting programs," but Worldwatch acknowledges that the influence of such programs is still limited.
Charting course to a sustainable economy is a daunting task, Flavin told reporters, but one that humanity must embrace.
"Whether this transition occurs rapidly enough to avoid a breakdown of the global economic system and the unravelling of political systems is," he said, "the single largest challenge facing the world today."
http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/jan2008/2008-01-10-10.asp
Copyright Environment News Service (ENS) 2008. All rights reserved.
Top |
|
|
|
| Aust govt will begin a national phase out on plastic bags
CANBERRA - The Australian government hopes to phase out plastic bags completely by the end of the year.
Environment Minister Peter Garrett yesterday confirmed he would meet with his state counterparts, as soon as April, to develop a strategy to speed up the process.
"We would like to see the phase out implemented by 2008 ... that is absolutely critical," Mr Garrett told Sky News."We want to phase them out, so do the states, we think it's absolutely critical that we get cracking on it.
 |
| Plastic shopping bags will be phased by the end of the 2008 in Australia. Photo / Glenn Jeffrey courtesy Nanosolar) |
"The nation produces four billion plastic bags annually with most of them ending up in landfill.
Environmental groups welcomed the move but retailers said it could add to greenhouse-gas emissions.
Australian Retailers Association CEO Richard Evans said a substitute, like paper, would be worse for the environment."Whoever wants to save the planet on this one is off the planet because it won't," Mr Evans told AAP.
He said the Productivity Commission recently found no evidence plastic bags caused significant damage to the environment.
"Plastic bags are a part of our lives - if we replace them we are going to replace them with paper and where's the paper going to come from."Do we cut down more trees to resolve the paper issue, do we increase greenhouse gases?
"Mr Evans said the government was playing "popular politics" and the emphasis should be on litter management."What I am calling on the government to do is rather than heavy-handed populist politics, start talking to the broader community in terms of litter management.
"One option the government will consider is imposing a levy on plastic bags. Both the retailers association and environmental group Clean Up Australia argue it is not a proven way to reduce the number of plastic bags in the long term."
It has always been the policy of Labour to look at a total ban in 2008 and that is what Minister Garrett is doing and we totally support that,"
Clean Up Australia chairman Ian Kiernan told AAP."But we are not in favour of a levy."We know that with the Irish example there was a dramatic reduction in the acceptance of plastic bags with the levy but that started to creep back and it has not proved to be effective in the long term.
"The retailers association said a levy would also add cost and inconvenience for consumers. Mr Garrett, who said he was not "personally" in favour of a levy, said consumers would not be disadvantaged.
"We certainly don't want to disadvantage the consumer and I don't believe in any way that any measure that will be brought forward will do that," Mr Garrett told Macquarie Radio.- AAP
http://msn.nzherald.co.nz/section/2/story.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=10486295
Top
|
|
Ireland to ban low-efficiency light bulbs
3 days ago
DUBLIN (AFP) — Ireland is to ban the sale of traditional light bulbs from next year and promote the use of low-energy CFL bulbs, environment minister John Gormley said Thursday.
He said the switch will see Ireland lead the way in Europe -- just as it taken the lead with its ban on smoking in public places and its levy on plastic shopping bags.
"The ultimate aim of this measure is to increase energy efficiency in Irish homes and businesses by facilitating a move to energy efficient light bulbs," said Gormley, who leads Ireland's Green Party.
"Ultimately, it will lead to savings of more than 180 million euros (263 million dollars) a year for Irish consumers and reduce emissions in Ireland by 800,000 tonnes, or one percent of its total."
The Greens are in government in Ireland for the first time as part of Prime Minister Bertie Ahern's coalition.
Gormley said the Irish initiative echoed the European Commission's intention to propose an EU-wide approach on minimum energy efficiency standards for light bulbs.
Environmental campaign group Greenpeace has been pressing for a changeover, saying that it would mean greater savings per household -- given how Irish homes use more energy for lighting than anywhere else in the European Union.
http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5hPlq2byYWAggJnvlS0AZ-_KMwAew
Copyright © 2008 AFP. All rights reserved.
Top
|
|
| Clean Your Plate: Energy-Saving Dishwashing Tips
By Melissa Breyer, Producer, Care2 Green Living

I recently considered the post-dinner party mess in my kitchen and wondered if tossing that mountain of food-glooped dishes in the trash might not be more energy-efficient than actually washing them.
Of course, that was the lazy princess in me, not the green warrior hostess that I really am. But I wondered: How does one tackle this scenario in the most eco-friendly manner?
Hand wash or dishwasher?
Rinse or just scrape?
Overload or stack neatly?
Fortunately, before the holiday parade of parties started, I came across a book entitled Consumer Guide to Home Energy Savings (New Society Publishers, 2007), which promises to save me money while I am saving the earth. Hurray!
Here is the book's authoritative and accesible advice for "Using a Dishwasher for Maximum Energy Savings."
Dishwashing Vs. Hand-Washing
Which method uses less energy?
Well, it depends on how old your dishwasher is, what settings you use, and how you would wash the dishes by hand. Studies are showing more and more that, when used to maximize energy-saving features, modern dishwashers can outperform all but the most frugal hand washer.
If you currently wash dishes by hand and fill sinks or plastic tubs with water, it's pretty easy to figure out whether you would use less water with a dishwasher. Simple measure how much water it takes to fill the wash and rinse containers.
If you wash dishes by hand two or three times a day, you might be surprised to find out how much water you're currently using. Newer dishwashers use only 3 to 10 gallons per cycle.
Scrape, Don't Rinse
Studies show that most people pre-rinse dishes before loading them into the dishwasher. Modern dishwashers—certainly those purchased within the last 5 to 10 years—do a superb job of cleaning even heavily soiled dishes. Don't be tempted to pre-rinse dishes before loading; simply scrape off any food and empty liquids and let the dishwasher do the rest.
This will save you time as well as water and energy.
If you find you must rinse dishes first, get in the habit of using cold water.
When Filling the Dishwasher
Load dishes according to manufacturer's instructions. Completely fill the racks to optimize water and energy use, but allow proper water circulation for adequate cleaning.
Wash only full loads.
The dishwasher uses the same amount of water whether it's half-full or completely full.
Putting dishes in the dishwasher throughout the day and running it once in the evening will use less water and energy than washing dishes by hand throughout the day.
If you find that it takes a day or two to get a full load, use the rinse and hold feature common on most newer models. This will prevent build up of dried-on food while saving time and water compared to pre-rinsing each item.
The rinse feature typically uses only 1 to 2 gallons of water.
Use Energy-Saving Options
Pay attention to the cycle options on your dishwasher and select the cycle that requires the least amount of energy for the job.
Use the no-heat air-dry feature on your dishwasher if it has one.
If you have an older dishwasher that doesn't include this feature, you can turn off the dishwasher after the final rinse cycle is completed and open the door to allow drying.
Using the no-heat dry feature or opening and air-drying dishes will increase the drying time, and it could lead to increased spotting, according to some in the industry. But try this method some time to see how well it works for your machine.
Turn Down the Water Heater Temperature
Since the early 1990s, most dishwashers in the U.S. have been sold with built-in heaters to boost water temperature to 140-145 degrees Fahrenheit, the temperature recommended by manufacturers for optimum dishwashing performance.
The advantage to the booster heater is that you can turn down your water heater thermostat, significantly reducing water-heating costs. Resetting your water heater to 120 degrees Fahrenheit (typically halfway between the "medium" and "low" settings) will provide adequate hot water for your household needs.
http://www.care2.com/greenliving/energy-saving-dishwashing-tips.html
Top
|
|
|
Quote of the week
|
"Presently, only 1% of the U.S. energy supply comes from renewable sources, including Solar, Wind and Hydro. If we applied the $400 billion dollars that has been spent in the Iraq war toward installing Wind Turbines on non-farmable lands in North and South Dakota, we could power the US, and become independent of imported oil."
-- Jim Dunn
(Center for Technology Commercialization, Nov. 19, 2006) |
Technology Corner
Next in our power generating technologies
Solar energy technology
Solar
Energy -- Energy from the Sun
Energy from the Sun
Photovoltaic Energy
Solar Thermal Energy
Solar Thermal Power Plants - parabolic trough, solar dish, and solar power tower
links page
ENERGY FROM THE SUN
The sun has produced energy for billions of years. Solar energy is the sun’s rays (solar radiation) that reach the earth.
Solar energy can be converted into other forms of energy, such as heat and electricity. In the 1830s, the British astronomer John Herschel used a solar thermal collector box (a device that absorbs sunlight to collect heat) to cook food during an expedition to Africa. Today, people use the sun's energy for lots of things.
Solar energy can be converted to thermal (or heat) energy and used to:
-
Heat water – for use in homes, buildings, or swimming pools.
-
Heat spaces – inside greenhouses, homes, and other buildings.
Solar energy can be converted to electricity in two ways:
-
Photovoltaic (PV devices) or “solar cells” – change sunlight directly into electricity. PV systems are often used in remote locations that are not connected to the electric grid. They are also used to power watches, calculators, and lighted road signs.
-
Solar Power Plants - indirectly generate electricity when the heat from solar thermal collectors is used to heat a fluid which produces steam that is used to power generator. Out of the 15 known solar electric generating units operating in the United States at the end of 2006, 10 of these are in California, and 5 in Arizona. No statistics are being collected on solar plants that produce less than 1 megawatt of electricity, so there may be smaller solar plants in a number of other states.
The major disadvantages of solar energy are:
-
The amount of sunlight that arrives at the earth's surface is not constant. It depends on location, time of day, time of year, and weather conditions.
-
Because the sun doesn't deliver that much energy to any one place at any one time, a large surface area is required to collect the energy at a useful rate.
PHOTOVOLTAIC ENERGY
Photovoltaic energy is the conversion of sunlight into electricity. A photovoltaic cell, commonly called a solar cell or PV, is the technology used to convert solar energy directly into electrical power. A photovoltaic cell is a nonmechanical device usually made from silicon alloys.
Sunlight is composed of photons, or particles of solar energy. These photons contain various amounts of energy corresponding to the different wavelengths of the solar spectrum. When photons strike a photovoltaic cell, they may be
reflected, pass right through, or be absorbed. Only the absorbed photons provide energy to generate electricity. When enough sunlight (energy) is absorbed by the material (a semiconductor), electrons are dislodged from the material's atoms. Special treatment of the material surface during manufacturing makes the front surface of the cell more receptive to free electrons, so the electrons naturally migrate to the surface.
When the electrons leave their position, holes are formed. When many electrons, each carrying a negative charge, travel toward the front surface of the cell, the resulting imbalance of charge between the cell's front and back surfaces creates a voltage potential like the negative and positive terminals of a battery. When the two surfaces are connected through an external load, electricity flows.
The photovoltaic cell is the basic building block of a photovoltaic system. Individual cells can vary in size from about 1 centimeter (1/2 inch) to about 10 centimeter (4 inches) across. However, one cell only produces 1 or 2 watts, which isn't enough power for most applications. To increase power output, cells are electrically connected into a packaged weather-tight module. Modules can be further connected to form an array. The term array refers to the entire generating plant, whether it is made up of one or several thousand modules. The number of modules connected together in an array depends on the amount of power output needed.
The performance of a photovoltaic array is dependent upon sunlight. Climate conditions (e.g., clouds, fog) have a significant effect on the amount of solar energy received by a photovoltaic array and, in turn, its performance. Most current technology photovoltaic modules are about 10 percent efficient in converting sunlight. Further research is being conducted to raise this efficiency to 20 percent.
The photovoltaic cell was discovered in 1954 by Bell Telephone researchers examining the sensitivity of a properly prepared silicon wafer to sunlight. Beginning in the late 1950s, photovoltaic cells were used to power U.S. space satellites (learn more about the history of photovaltaic cells). The success of PV in space generated commercial applications for this technology. The simplest photovoltaic systems power many of the small calculators and wrist watches used everyday. More complicated systems provide electricity to pump water, power communications equipment, and even provide electricity to our homes.
Some advantages of photovoltaic systems are:
-
Conversion from sunlight to electricity is direct, so that bulky mechanical generator systems are unnecessary.
-
PV arrays can be installed quickly and in any size required or allowed.
-
The environmental impact is minimal, requiring no water for system cooling and generating no by-products.
Photovoltaic cells, like batteries, generate direct current (DC) which is generally used for small loads (electronic equipment). When DC from photovoltaic cells is used for commercial applications or sold to electric utilities using the electric grid, it must be converted to alternating current (AC) using inverters, solid state devices that convert DC power to AC.
Historically, PV has been used at remote sites to provide electricity. In the future PV arrays may be located at sites that are also connected to the electric grid enhancing the reliability of the distribution system.
SOLAR THERMAL HEAT
Solar thermal(heat) energy is often used for heating swimming pools, heating water used in homes, and space heating of buildings.
Solar space heating systems can be classified as passive or active.
Passive space heating is what happens to your car on a hot summer day. In buildings, the air is circulated past a solar heat surface(s) and through the building by convection (i.e. less dense warm air tends to rise while more dense cooler air moves downward) . No mechanical equipment is needed for passive solar heating.
Active heating systems require a collector to absorb and collect solar radiation. Fans or pumps are used to circulate the heated air or heat absorbing fluid. Active systems often include some type of energy storage system.
Solar collectors can be either nonconcentrating or concentrating.
1) Nonconcentrating collectors – have a collector area (i.e. the area that intercepts the solar radiation) that is the same as the absorber area (i.e., the area absorbing the radiation). Flat-plate collectors are the most common and are used when temperatures below about 200o degrees F are sufficient, such as for space heating.
2) Concentrating collectors – where the area intercepting the solar radiation is greater, sometimes hundreds of times greater, than the absorber area.
SOLAR THERMAL POWER PLANTS
Solar thermal power plants use the sun's rays to heat a fluid, from which heat transfer systems may be used to produce steam. The steam, in turn, is converted into mechanical energy in a turbine and into electricity from a conventional generator coupled to the turbine. Solar thermal power generation works essentially the same as generation from fossil fuels except that instead of using steam produced from the combustion of fossil fuels, the steam is produced by the heat collected from sunlight. Solar thermal technologies use concentrator systems due to the high temperatures needed to heat the fluid. The three main types of solar-thermal power systems are:
SOLAR ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Solar energy is free, and its supplies are unlimited. Using solar energy produces no air or water pollution but does have some indirect impacts on the environment. For example, manufacturing the photovoltaic cells used to convert sunlight into electricity, consumes silicon and produces some waste products. In addition, large solar thermal farms can also harm desert ecosystems if not properly managed.
Last Revised: November 2007
Sources: Energy Information Administration, Electric Power Annual, Form EIA-860, Annual Electric Generator Report database, 2006.
Top |
Daily Energy Prices

Top |
New Zealand Daily Storage Graph

Top |
|